|
The Effect
of
The Organic Magic Pill
on Systemic pH
Clinical
Studies By
Dr.
Frank Russo, PhD
Professor Biological Sciences
Towson University, Towson MD
&
Director of Research & Development
Metabolix Nutrition, Inc.
Prepared for Atlas Operations Inc.
Pompano Beach, FL
Abstract
Chronic, low-grade metabolic acidosis has been implicated
as an underlying cause of a variety of conditions with adverse
effects on health, in particular the catabolic effects on
skeletal and muscle tissue. Metabolic acidosis is a state
in which the blood pH is low (under 7.35) due to increased
production of H+ by the body or the inability of the body
to form bicarbonate (HCO3-). It is well documented that the
composition of the diet can affect the body's acid-base balance
due to the ability of specific foods to produce acid or base
as a result of their digestion and metabolism; and by manipulating
diet this balance can be tilted in favor of net acid accumulation
(lower pH) or net base, primarily bicarbonate, production
(higher pH). Foods high in mineral salts and organic acids,
namely most fruits and vegetables, tend to increase pH. This
study examined the effects of a nutritional supplement based
on concentrated "green" (vegetable) extracts, digestive
enzymes, probiotics, and anti-oxidants on acid-base status
by observing changes in urinary and salivary pH. Twelve healthy
subjects between the ages of 23 and 44 were recruited to participate
in the study. All participants consumed a protein supplement
daily during the course of the study. Six subjects consumed
the Green Cell product for 10 days followed by 10 days not
taking the product and six subjects served as controls not
taking product for the 20 day duration of the study. Both
groups measured their urine and saliva pH 3 times per day
and the average pH were recorded for each day. There was a
significant group by time interaction (p < .05) between
the first 10 days and second 10 days and a significant difference
in pH between the groups during the first 10 days (p <
.01). These results suggest that the Magic Pill product appears
to be effective in maintaining increased urinary and salivary
pH.
The
Effect of Organic Magic Pill on Urinary and Salivary pH
Normal pH is held between a narrow range of 7.35 and 7.45
in arterial blood and slightly lower, 7.31-7.41 in venous
blood, however it is likely that when pH is close to the low
end of this range, even though still considered to be "normal"
the body is attempting to increase pH and correct a "low-grade"
metabolic acidosis (4). Metabolic acidosis can be generated
by increased acid (hydrogen ion) production, extra-renal loss
of base (bicarbonate ion), impaired renal acid excretion,
or a combination of any of these factors. Metabolic acidosis,
in a clinical sense, can be serious and life threatening subsequent
to conditions such as diabetes, kidney failure, shock, and
ingesting certain toxins (13). However metabolic acidosis
can also be a mild, chronic condition. Under normal physiologic
circumstances, the net endogenous acid production rate (NEAP)
and the degree of the attendant low-grade metabolic acidosis
are determined primarily by the composition of the diet (4,
7, 15). And there is also a link between low-grade chronic
metabolic acidosis, diet and clinical disorders, including
nephrolithiasis, osteoporosis, sarcopenia, epilepsy, and endocrine
disturbances (1, 4, 8, 11, 13, 15, 16, 17, 19, 26). Chronic
low grade metabolic acidosis can occur even in healthy individuals
if consumption of foods high in acid precursors is disproportionate
to that of foods rich in base precursors (vegetable foods)
(4, 8).
As stated above the cause of diet induced metabolic acidosis
is an excess consump-tion of acid forming foods compared with
base forming foods. Protein metabolism yields non-carbonic
acids due largely to oxidation of cationic and sulfur-containing
amino acids (8, 9, 14). In addition high sodium chloride intake
can also induce mild metabolic acidosis (8, 12). Consumption
of most vegetable foods on the other hand increases bicarbonate
production due to the metabolism of dietary organic acids/alkali
salts (e.g. sodium citrate, potassium citrate, potassium gluconate,
etc.)(8, 9, 15).The carbon dioxide produced by oxidation of
organic acids from fruits and vegetables is exhaled, which
also helps reduce the acid load on the body. Ingested bicarbonate
as mineral salts (e.g. sodium bicarbonate, potassium bicarbonate,
etc.) can also increase the plasma bicarbonate concentration
(1, 6, 8, 9, 15, 17).
The extent to which diet contributes to acidosis can quantitatively
determined by measuring the potential renal acid load (PRAL)
of individual foods (22, 24). On average this is estimated
to be 1-2 mEq of acid per kg body weight of acid per day or
70-150 mEq/d on the diet typical of industrialized societies,
which are high in processed foods based on processed cereal
grains, animal protein, and a high salt content. This is believed
to result in a low-grade CMA with secondary bone and muscle
catabolism due to increased NEAP and loss of base/bicarbonate
(6,
7). It has been estimated that pre-agricultural dietary PRAL
was negative 88 mEq total per day, indicating the retention
of base (8, 22, 23, 24). The PRAL (calculated for a 24-hour
period), together with a relatively constant daily amount
of urinary excreted organic acids (in healthy subjects proportional
to body surface area or body weight), yields the daily net
acid excretion (7, 9, 22, 23, 24).
The
body attempts to normalize pH by two primary mechanisms: 1)
plasma bicarbonate to buffer the increase in endogenous acid
production, and 2) urinary excretion of hydrogen ions. As
plasma bicarbonate concentration decreases progressively when
endogenous acid production is increased by dietary changes
to acid producing foods in normal subjects, the skeletal stores
of bicarbonate are tapped into, thereby releasing bicarbonate
ions that can buffer increases in hydrogen ions ultimately
forming carbon dioxide and water by the reaction: CO2 + H20
? H2CO3 ? HCO3- + H+ (17). In addition, acidosis-induced proteolysis
appears to be an acid-base homeostatic mechanism. Amino acids
released from skeletal muscle, in particular glutamine, which
is used by the kidney for synthesis of ammonia; the kidney
can increase the excretion of acid (as ammonium) in the urine,
thereby mitigating the severity of the acidosis (4, 13). It
has been reported that chronic metabolic acidosis induces
muscle protein breakdown, and that correction of acidosis
reverses the effect (6, 7, 26). Indeed, because of the attendant
low grade chronic acidosis, habitual ingestion of typical
net acid-producing diets might chronically sustain a slightly
increased state of protein breakdown and consequent nitrogen
wasting that can be considered a tonic "normal"
state in adult humans, accounting for the normal progressive
decrease in muscle mass (sarcopenia) as adults get older.
Normal age-related decline in kidney function can increase
the severity of diet-dependent acidosis thus amplifying acid
induced muscle wasting in older individuals (8, 13).
It
is also possible that skeletal muscle hypertrophy induced
by resistance training may be attenuated since a positive
nitrogen balance is necessary for muscle hypertrophy may be
more difficult to achieve. The increased protein intake required
for optimal muscle adaptation could be negated by the acidifying
effect of dietary protein unless countermeasures are taken
to ensure a net dietary alkaline load instead of an acid load.
In order to correct this low grade CMA and bring acid-base
balance towards a more alkaline state consuming a diet high
in alkaline/base producing foods compared to acid producing
foods is necessary. When dietary protein intake and consumption
of processed foods high in sodium chloride is low, the usual
content of the diet or moderate increases in base producing
vegetables and fruits can usually suffice (5, 16). However
as protein intake increases it is necessary to consume increasing
amounts of these foods to offset endogenous acid production,
which can be difficult to achieve because it is often inconvenient
to consume large amounts of vegetables and fruit. This consideration
prompted us to investigate, in healthy adult subjects eating
a normal net acid-producing diet, whether a dietary supplement
containing a blend of vegetable powder extracts, minerals,
digestive enzymes, and probiotics is effective in maintaining
alkaline conditions within the body.
Conventional testing of acid-base balance on a clinical basis
typically involves sampling blood and/or urine and measuring
the difference between major plasma cations and major plasma
anions; Anion Gap (AG) = ([Na+] +[K+]) - ([Cl--] +[HCO3-])
or Strong Ion Difference [SID] = [Na+] + [K+] + [Ca2+] + [MG2+]
- [CL-] - [other strong anions] (10, 13). However it is obviously
unrealistic for healthy individuals to have these measurements
taken on a daily basis. Long-term acid loading in humans causes
an increase in renal acid excretion, normally leading to the
urine becoming more acidic (22). This can also be measured
clinically where net acid excretion (NAE) is = NH4 + titratable
acid - urinary HCO3- (15, 22). The total increment in NAE
by the kidneys, however, is often lower than total acid production,
resulting in a positive hydrogen-ion balance. Thus urinary
pH will decrease as the kidneys attempt to excrete excess
acid and thus can be used as an indicator of excess acid excretion
and acid-base balance (22, 25). In addition, the pH of saliva
can also provide and indication of the body's acid-base status
(2, 3, 14). Immediately following feeding bicarbonate is released
into the blood due to hydrochloric acid production by stomach
parietal cells (alkaline tide). Subsequently sodium bicarbonate
is secreted from the pancreas into the small intestine to
neutralize the acid chyme entering the small intestine from
the stomach after feeding. The bicarbonate is then retained
by absorption back into the blood plasma. As serum bicarbonate
is used to help buffer the excess hydrogen ions, and remaining
bicarbonate is available to be taken up by alkaline glands
in the body including the salivary glands (21).
The
purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the effect of
an Organic Magic Pill supplement on daily urine pH and saliva
pH in subjects consuming a protein supplemented diet.
Method
Subjects
Subjects were divided into 2 groups of six (6) participants.
Participants were given an informed consent as to the testing
of the product. Subjects were chosen at random, and randomly
selected for the test group and control group.
Equipment
Participants weighed on a Detecto 5000 scale for body weight.
A detailed body fat analysis was then performed using the
Lange Skin Fold Caliper (Model # 014921). All participants
were test strips to measure urine and saliva pH (phion Nutrition
Scottsdale, AZ)
Experimental
Protocol
All participants were required to take in 40-70 additional
grams of supplemental protein (Metabolix Nutrition Systems,
Inc., Lutherville, MD) on a daily basis for 20 days. The test
group was instructed to take two (2) Magic Pill capsules (Atlas
Operations Inc. Pompano Beach, FL) with each meal for the
first ten day period, followed by no supplement for the second
10 days, while the control group was instructed to take just
the supplemental protein for the entire 20 days. The components
of the proprietary blend Magic Pill are listed in Table 1.
Each subject was instructed to take urinary and salivary pH
levels using pH test strips three times per day - one hour
after the first meal of the day, one hour after the second
meal of the day and prior to bedtime. pH levels were recorded
for a period of 20 days and mean pH level for each day was
calculated using the equation provided by the pH test strip
manufacturer:
(avg
urine pH + avg saliva pH * 2 ) / 3
Taken three times per day and using the above equation provides
a "moving average" proposed by Reams (3) that accounts
for the relatively wide fluctuations in urinary and salivary
pH throughout the day while also accounting for the relative
contribution of the respective values as indicators of blood
and tissue acid-base status.
Statistical
Analysis
Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS PC 13.0 version
software. Means ± SD were calculated for all variables.
A One Way ANOVA was used to determine if there were any differences
between groups with respect to age, weight, and percent body
fat. A two-way group (Magic Pill vs. no therapy) x time (first
10 days vs. second ten days) analysis of variance (ANOVA)
with repeated measures on time was used to compare the two
groups over time on the daily average combined urine and saliva
pH. Significant group x time interactions were followed up
with pairwise comparisons based on estimated marginal means
with Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons. Differences
were considered significant at p < 0.05.
Table
1: The Magic Pill
Brown
Rice Bran |
Lactobacillus
Rhamnonsus |
Quercetin |
Wheat
Grass Juice Pwr |
Dandelion
Powder |
Barley
Grass Juice Pwr |
Bifidobacterium
Longum |
Spinach
Powder |
Chlorella |
Blue
Greem Algae |
Carrot
Juice Powder |
Lactobacillus
Acidophilus |
Bee
Pollen Powder |
Beet
Juice Powder |
Aloe
Vera Powder |
| Parsley
Leaf Powder |
Lactobacillus
Casei |
Flax
Seed Powder |
Kale
Juice Powder |
Grape
Seed Extract |
Lecithin |
Lipase |
COQ10 |
Green
Tea |
Lactase |
Milk
Thistle Extract |
Astragalus
Powder |
Amylase |
Lycopene |
Royal
Jelly |
Protease |
Alpha
Lipoic Acid |
Contains
Milk, soy. |
Results
The anthropometrical data for the participants are presented
in Table 2. The groups differed with respect age with the
experimental group significantly younger than the control
group (31.5y ± 6.1y vs. 39.8y ± 2.4y, p = .012).
There were no significant differences between the groups with
respect to weight (184 ± 58.5lbs vs. 181 ± 66.1lbs)
and percent body fat (16.3% ± 5.7 vs. 21.5% ±
5.8).
Table
2: Subject Data
Experimental group
Gender |
F |
M |
M |
F |
F |
M |
Age
(y) |
34 |
28 |
28 |
23 |
39 |
37 |
Weight
(lbs) |
133 |
218 |
263 |
115 |
153 |
222 |
BF% |
9.1% |
16.8% |
14.6% |
21.2% |
12.1% |
24.5% |
|
Age |
Weight |
BF% |
|
|
|
Mean |
31.5 |
184 |
16.3 |
|
|
|
Std.
Deviation |
6.1 |
58.5 |
5.7 |
|
|
|
Control
group
Gender |
F |
M |
M |
F |
F |
M |
Age
(y) |
44 |
39 |
41 |
38 |
37 |
40 |
Weight
(lbs) |
159 |
211 |
119 |
167 |
131 |
299 |
BF% |
29% |
11.6% |
15.7% |
12.9% |
23.4% |
36.2% |
|
Age |
Weight |
BF% |
|
|
|
Mean |
39.8 |
181 |
21.5 |
|
|
|
Std.
Deviation |
2.4 |
66.1 |
9.8 |
|
|
|
The
average daily pH values are shown in Table 3 and Figure 1
for the test group and the control group for the initial 10
day period where the test group was using the Magic Pill product
followed by the second 10 days of the 20 day experimental
period where both groups were not using the product. For the
first 10 days of the study the mean combined urine and saliva
pH for the experimental group ingesting the Magic Pill was
6.82 ± .22 and for the second 10 days it dropped to
6.49 ± .39. For the control group the mean daily combined
pH was 6.46 ± .07 for the first 10 days and 6.51 ±
.05 for the second 10 days. Statistical analysis revealed
a significant group (experimental vs. control) by time (1st
10d vs. 2nd 10d) interaction (p < .05). Post hoc analysis
revealed a significant difference in pH during the first 10
days between the groups (p < .01) while there was not a
significant difference between groups for the second 10 days.
Table
3: Cumulative mean pH for the first 10 days followed
by the second 10 days; for the control group and the group
ingesting the Magic Pill product for the first 10 days only.
Group |
|
10
day
average |
10
day
post average |
Control |
Mean |
6.46 |
6.51 |
|
N |
6 |
6 |
|
Std.
Deviation |
.07 |
.05 |
Green
Cell |
Mean |
6.82 |
6.49 |
|
N |
6 |
6 |
|
Std.
Deviation |
.22 |
.39 |
Total |
Mean |
6.64 |
6.5 |
| |
N |
12 |
1 |
| |
Std.
Deviation |
.24 |
.27 |
Cumulative mean pH values

Figure 1: Cumulative mean pH values. First 10 days (red bar)
followed by the second 10 days (green bar) for the control
group and the group ingesting the Magic Pill product for the
first 10 days only.
Discussion
The results of this study demonstrated that consuming the
Magic Pill product maintained a significantly higher combined
urinary and salivary pH. This result is not surprising since
the test product contains a blend of agents individually known
to have an alkalizing effect on the body; these include the
vegetable extracts, algae, and digestive enzymes. A previous
study by Burns examined the alkalizing effect of a mineral
based supplement (pH Control, pH Sciences, Inc.) on urine
pH. In this study 23 subjects (no control group) ingested
4 x 1000 mg tablets for five days. Urine was collected only
on waking up in the morning on the first and on the 5th day.
A mean significant increase of 0.32 pH units was observed
which they calculated to be a 53% reduction in urine acidity.
This value is in agreement with the increased pH in the current
study of 0.33 pH units for the treatment group.
Allie
and Rogers (1) examined the effects of mineral (calcium, magnesium)
and citrate supplementation for 7 days on mean urinary pH
in an attempt to evaluate urinary stone risk. In this study
all 3 supplements increased urinary pH with the citrate having
the largest effect increasing pH from 6.83 to 7.40. An interesting
finding from this study was that citrate supplementation resulted
in reduced excretion of calcium and magnesium but increased
sodium excretion whereas the supplements containing the minerals
also increased excretion of those minerals. Citrate is a major
component of diets that result in a reduced PRAL, NEAP, and
acid excretion (8, 24).
Although only urine and saliva pH was recorded in the current
study, this data can be compared to measured urinary net acid
excretion in previous studies. In a review on bone buffering
of acid and base in humans, subjects eating a control diet
had a mean urinary pH = 6.05 ± 0.44 and mean urinary
net acid excretion = 49 ± 28 meq/day) (17). Subjects
that received NH4Cl had a mean urinary pH = 5.40 ±
0.13 and mean urine net acid excretion = 272 ± 61 meq/day
while the subjects that received KHCO3 or Na HCO3 had a mean
urinary pH = 6.67 ± 0.18; mean urinary net acid excretion
= 6 ± 13 meq/day. Therefore it is probable that a more
detailed urine analysis would have shown such an increase
in net acid excretion after the participants ceased taking
the supplement.
One
limitation of the current study was that detailed dietary
records for the 20 day period were not kept nor were detailed
exercise records. This would have enabled us to examine other
factors that may affect urinary and salivary pH and determine
how the treatment affected acid-base balance. It is possible
to estimate the net rate of endogenous noncarbonic acid production
(NEAP) by recording the precise amounts of all foods eaten
based on the tables provided by Remerand Manz (22). Frassetto,
et al. was able to estimate net endogenous noncarbonic acid
production in humans from diet potassium and protein contents
exclusively (7). Exercise can also affect urinary pH. Moriguchi
measured circadian changes in urinary pH as well as bicarbonate
in a group of female volleyball players during an intense
3 day training regimen. They found that urine pH dropped by
approximately one full pH unit during exercise and that recovery
back to pre-exercise levels took as much as 7 hours (20).
Another limitation was that the pH measurements were taken
using litmus paper test strips which are not as precise as
more sophisticated (and expensive) equipment and also have
some degree of subjectivity. However use of the test strips
enables individuals to monitor their urine and saliva pH conveniently
and consistently and this feedback can be important in enabling
them to make necessary dietary adjustments to correct acid-base
status.
Conclusion
To maintain optimal acid-base balance the body is constantly
seeking to get rid of the excess acids that accumulate as
a result of cellular metabolism and diet. These acids negatively
affect the tissues and can deplete the body of minerals. One
of the principal systems it uses for this purpose is the renal
system (kidneys). The normal rate of acid excretion through
the kidneys gives urine a pH that falls between 6.75 and 7.25
(22, 25). By testing the degree of acidity of the urine, you
can determine whether your body is eliminating a normal quantity
of acids. If the acid excretion rate is higher than normal,
the urinary pH will be more acidic (lower). This low urinary
pH is a potential indication that the body is in an acid state.
Another indicator of the overall pH balance in your body is
the pH of your saliva. When the body has adequate mineral
reserves, saliva pH is 7.0 to 7.4. A low saliva pH reading
indicates that the mineral reserves are low, and are being
used to buffer acids elsewhere in the body (3). The current
study showed that using the Magic Pill product is associated
with increased pH levels up to these values.
References:
1. Allie, S. and Rogers, A. Effects of calcium carbonate,
magnesium oxide, and sodium citrate bicarbonate on the urinary
risk factors for kidney stone formation. Clin Chem Lab Med
41(1): 39-45, 2003.
2. Bardow A, Madsen J, Nauntofte B The bicarbonate concentration
in human saliva does not exceed the plasma level under normal
physiological conditions. Clin Oral Investig . 2000 Dec;4(4):245-53.
3. Beddoe AF (1984). Biological Ionization as Applied to Human
Nutrition, Principles and Techniques. Agro-Bio Systems, Fort
Bragg, Ca
4. Brown, SE, Jaffe, R. Acid-alkaline balance and its effect
on bone health. Int. J. Ingerative Med. 2(6), 2000
5. Celia J Prynne, Gita D Mishra, Maria A O'Connell, Graciela
Muniz, M Ann Laskey, Liya Yan, Ann Prentice and Fiona Ginty
Fruit and vegetable intakes and bone mineral status: a cross-sectional
study in 5 age and sex cohorts1,2,3 American Journal of Clinical
Nutrition, Vol. 83, No. 6, 1420-1428, June 2006
6.
Frassetto LA, Morris RC Jr, A. Potassium Bicarbonate Reduces
Urinary Nitrogen Excretion in Postmenopausal Women Journal
of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism Vol. 82, No. 1, 1997
7. Frassetto LA, Todd KM, Morris RC, and Anthony Sebastian.
Estimation of net endogenous noncarbonic acid production in
humans from diet potassium and protein contents1-3 Am J Clin
Nutr 1998;68:576-83.
8.
Frassetto L, Morris RC Jr, Sellmeyer DE, Todd K, Sebastian
A. Diet, evolution and aging--the pathophysiologic effects
of the post-agricultural inversion of the potassium-to-sodium
and base-to-chloride ratios in the human diet. Eur J Nutr.
2001 Oct;40(5):200-13.
9. Frassetto LA, Morris RC Jr, Sebastian A. A practical approach
to the balance between acid production and renal acid excretion
in humans. J Nephrol. 2006 Mar-Apr;19 Suppl 9:S33-40.
10. Gattinoni L, Carlesso E, Cadringher P, Caironi P. Strong
ion difference in urine: new perspectives in acid-base assessment.
Crit Care. 2006 Apr 7;10(2):137
11.
Gibney MJ, Walsh M, Brennan L, Roche HM, German B, van Ommen
B. Metabolomics in human nutrition: opportunities and challenges.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2005 Sep;82(3):497-503.
12. Heer, M., Frings, P., Baecker, N (Cologne, D) High sodium
chloride intake causes mild metabolic acidosis. Is this the
cause for bone resorption? 6th International Symposium on
Nutritional Aspects of Osteoporosis Lausanne, Switzerland
04.05.2006 - 06.05.2006
13. Johnson, LR. Essential Medical Physiology, 3rd Ed. Elsevier
Academic Press, San Diego, CA. 454-461. 2003
14. Kamisawa T, Y, Egawa N, Sakaki N, Inokuma S, Kamata N.
Salivary gland involvement in chronic pancreatitis of various
etiologies. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Feb;98(2):323-6.
15. Kurtz I, Maher T, Hulter HN, Schambelan M, Sebastian A.
Effect of diet on plasma acid-base composition in normal humans.
Kidney Int 1983;24:670-80. Estimation of net endogenous noncarbonic
acid production in humans from diet potassium and protein
contents1-3 Am J Clin Nutr 1998;68:576-83.
16.
Lanham-NewFruit SA. Fruit and vegetables: the unexpected natural
answer to the question of osteoporosis prevention? American
Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 83, No. 6, 1254-1255,
June 2006
17. J. Lemann Jr., D. A. Bushinsky, and L. L. Hamm Bone buffering
of acid and base in humans. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, November
1, 2003; 285(5): F811 - 832.
19. Maurer, M. 1, Riesen, W.2, Muser, J.1, Hulter, HN.3, and
Krapf, R.1 Neutralization of Western diet inhibits bone resorption
independently of K intake and reduces cortisol secretion in
humans Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 284: F32-F40, 2003.
20. Moriguchi, T. Circadian Changes in Urinary Bicarbonate,
Nitric Oxide Metabolites and pH in Female Player during Handball
Camp Involved in an Exercise, Rest and Sleep Cycle.. The Tohoku
Journal of Experimental Medicine 196(4) 2002
21. Park K, Hurley PT, Roussa E, Cooper GJ, Smith CP, Thevenod
F, Steward MC, and Case, RM. Expression of a sodium bicarbonate
cotransporter in human parotid salivary glands. Arch Oral
Biol. 2002 Jan;47(1):1-9.
22. Remer T, Manz F. Potential renal acid load of foods and
its influence on urine pH. J Am Diet Assoc. 1995 Jul; 95(7):791-7.
23. Dietary potential renal acid load and renal net acid excretion
in healthy, free-living children and adolescents. Am J Clin
Nutr. 2003 May; 77(5):1255-60.
24. Sebastian A, Frassetto LA, Sellmeyer DE, Merriam RL, Morris
RC Jr. Estimation of the net acid load of the diet of ancestral
preagricultural Homo sapiens and their hominid ancestors.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2002 Dec;76(6):1308-16.
25. Whiting, SJ1, Bell, J1, and Brown, SE2. First morning
urine measured with pH paper strips reflects acid excretion.
1College of Pharmacy and Nutrition, 2Osteoporosis Education
Project, East Syracuse, NY, USA
26. Wiederkehr, M., Krapf, R. Metabolic and endocrine effects
of metabolic acidosis in humans. Swiss Med Wkly. 131:127-132.
2001.
27. Yuen AW. Low-grade chronic metabolic acidosis is a contributory
mechanism in the development of chronic epilepsy. Epilepsy
Behav. 2006 Mar;8(2):347-9. Epub 2006 Feb 3.
|